Circulating microRNA analysis in a prospective co-clinical trial identifies MIR652-3p as a response biomarker and driver of regorafenib resistance mechanisms in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib has demonstrated efficacy in chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, lack of predictive biomarkers and concerns over significant toxicities hamper the use of regorafenib in clinical practice. METHODS: Serial liquid biopsies were obtained at baseline and monthly until disease progression in chemo-refractory mCRC patients treated with regorafenib in a phase II clinical trial (PROSPECT-R n=40; NCT03010722) and in a multicentric validation cohort (n=241). Tissue biopsies collected at baseline, after 2 months and at progression in the PROSPECT-R trial were used to establish Patient-Derived Organoids (PDOs) and for molecular analyses. MicroRNA profiling was performed on baseline bloods using the NanoString nCounter platform and results were validated by digital droplet PCR and/or In Situ Hybridization in paired liquid and tissue biopsies. PDOs co-cultures and PDO-xenotransplants were generated for functional analyses. RESULTS: Large-scale microRNA expression analysis in longitudinal matched liquid and tissue biopsies from the PROSPECT-R trial identified MIR652-3p as a biomarker of clinical benefit to regorafenib. These findings were confirmed in an independent validation cohort and in a "control" group of 100 patients treated with lonsurf. Using ex vivo co-culture assays paired with single-cell RNA-sequencing of PDO established pre- and post-treatment, we modelled regorafenib response observed in vivo and in patients, and showed that MIR652-3p controls resistance to regorafenib by impairing regorafenib-induced lethal autophagy and by orchestrating the switch from neo-angiogenesis to vessel co-option. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identify MIR652-3p as potential biomarker and as a driver of cell and non-cell autonomous mechanisms of resistance to regorafenib.

Claudin-18.2 testing and its impact in the therapeutic management of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas: A literature review with expert opinion.

Claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a member of the tight junction protein family and is a highly selective biomarker with frequent abnormal expression during the occurrence and development of various primary malignant tumors, including gastric cancer (GC) and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinomas (EGJA). For these reasons, CLDN18.2 has been investigated as a therapeutic target for GC/EGJA malignancies. Recently, zolbetuximab has been proposed as a new standard of care for patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced and metastatic GC/EGJA. The use of CLDN18 IHC assays to select patients who might benefit from anti-CLDN18.2 therapy is currently entering clinical practice. In this setting, pathologists play a central role in therapeutic decision-making. Accurate biomarker assessment is essential to ensure the best therapeutic option for patients. In the present review, we provide a comprehensive overview of available evidence on CLDN18.2 testing and its impact on the therapeutic management of patients with GC/EGJA, as well as some practical suggestions for CLDN18.2 staining interpretation and potential pitfalls in the real-world setting.

Negative Hyperselection of Patients with HER2+ and RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Dual HER2 Blockade: the PRESSING-HER2 Study.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the negative prognostic impact of a panel of genomic alterations (PRESSING-HER2 panel) and lack of HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with HER2+, RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving dual HER2 blockade. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The PRESSING-HER2 panel of HER2 mutations/rearrangements and RTK/MAPK mutations/amplifications was assessed by NGS. HER2 amplification was confirmed by NGS if copy-number variation (CNV) was ≥ 6. With a case-control design, hypothesizing 30% and 5% PRESSING-HER2 positivity in resistant [progression-free survival (PFS) <4 months and no RECIST response] versus sensitive cohorts, respectively, 35 patients were needed per group. RESULTS: PRESSING-HER2 alterations included HER2 mutations/rearrangements, EGFR amplification, and BRAF mutations and had a prevalence of 27% (9/33) and 3% (1/35) in resistant versus sensitive patients (P = 0.005) and 63% predictive accuracy. Overall, HER2 nonamplified status by NGS had 10% prevalence. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were worse in PRESSING-HER2+ versus negative (2.2 vs. 5.3 months, P < 0.001; 5.4 vs. 14.9 months, P = 0.001) and in HER2 nonamplified versus amplified (1.6 vs. 5.2 months, P < 0.001; 7.4 vs. 12.4 months, P = 0.157). These results were confirmed in multivariable analyses [PRESSING-HER2 positivity: PFS HR = 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-6.69, P = 0.005; OS HR = 2.93, 95% CI, 1.32-6.48, P = 0.007]. Combining PRESSING-HER2 and HER2 CNV increased the predictive accuracy to 75%. CONCLUSIONS: PRESSING-HER2 panel and HER2 nonamplified status by NGS warrant validation as potential predictive markers in this setting. See related commentary by Raghav et al., p. 260.

Negative hyperselection of elderly patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving initial panitumumab plus FOLFOX or 5-FU/LV.

BACKGROUND: Upfront anti-EGFR therapy represents the standard of care for patients with left-sided, MSS/pMMR, RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Molecular 'hyperselection' may optimize EGFR inhibition by detecting additional resistance alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used comprehensive genomic profiling on archival samples of elderly patients enrolled in the PANDA trial to detect: HER2 amplification/mutations; MET amplification; NTRK/ROS1/ALK/RET rearrangements; PIK3CA exon 20 mutations; PTEN alterations; AKT1 mutations; MAP2K1 mutations. We defined 'Gene Altered' (GA) patients whose tumour harboured at least one alteration, and 'Hyperselected' (HS) those without. Survival and tumour response outcomes were correlated to hyperselection status alone or combined with primary tumour sidedness or treatment arm. RESULTS: Genomic alterations were detected in 41/147 patients (27.9%). PFS, OS and ORR were inferior in GA versus HS (median PFS: 7.6 versus 12.8 months, HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.43-3.03, p < 0.001; median OS: 20.0 versus 29.5 months, HR = 1.82, 95% CI:1.23-2.69, p = 0.002; ORR: 51% versus 71%; OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.91, p = 0.02). In the multivariable models, the impact of hyperselection on PFS and OS was confirmed. Lower ORR was observed with 5-FU/LV/panitumumab in GA (40% versus 62%), but not in HS (70% versus 72%). GA was associated with worse survival and response regardless of primary tumour sidedness, whereas in the HS subgroup, right-and left sided tumours had similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular hyperselection and comprehensive genomic profiling have a potential usefulness in elderly patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type, pMMR/MSS mCRC, eligible for upfront EGFR inhibition.

Predictive Impact of RNF43 Mutations in Patients With Proficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Stable BRAFV600E-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Target Therapy or Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Target therapy (TT) with encorafenib plus cetuximab is a standard option in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated (mut) pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, mutations in RNF43, encoding a negative regulator of the WNT pathway, were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) BRAFV600E-mut mCRC treated with TT. Here, we explored the effect of RNF43 mutations on the efficacy of second-line TT versus standard chemotherapy (CT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with pMMR/MSS BRAFV600E-mut tumors, available RNF43 mutational status, and treated with second-line TT or oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-based CT was analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with pMMR/MSS BRAFV600E-mut mCRC were included. RNF43 was found mut in 34 (26%) cases. Among RNF43 mutants, TT was associated with longer PFS (7.7 v 3.0 months; P = .002) and higher overall response rate (ORR; 45% v 0%; P = .009) compared with CT. Conversely, among RNF43 wild-type (wt) patients, only a trend for longer PFS (4.5 v 3.7 months; P = .064) favoring TT, with no differences in ORR (P = .14), was observed. After excluding 36 patients receiving TT in third line or beyond, a longer OS (19.4 v 10.1 months; P = .022) and a numerically OS advantage (10.6 v 6.6 months; P = .068) were reported for TT both in the RNF43-mut and in the RNF43 wt groups. However, no interaction effect was reported between RNF43 mutational status and treatment in ORR (Pinteraction = .96), PFS (Pinteraction = .13), and OS (Pinteraction = .44). CONCLUSION: Patients with pMMR/MSS BRAFV600E-mut mCRC achieve benefit from TT versus CT independently of RNF43 mutational status, although a higher magnitude of benefit from TT is observed in RNF43-mut tumors. These findings deserve confirmation in concluded and ongoing randomized trials.

Mytomicin-C, Metronomic Capecitabine, and Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable or Relapsed Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Appendiceal Origin.

INTRODUCTION: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare, slow growing tumor, traditionally considered chemoresistant. The only curative approach is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). At disease relapse, or in patients with inoperable disease at diagnosis, no standard treatment has been defined, though nonrandomized series showed promising results with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in patients with relapsed or unresectable PMP and confirmed disease progression at baseline. Patients received MMC (7 mg/m2 every 6 weeks, up to a maximum of 4 cycles) plus metronomic capecitabine (625 mg/sqm/day b.i.d.) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate according to RECIST v1.1 criteria, serum markers response and safety. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included. At a median follow-up of 26.1 months (IQR, 17.7-49.6), median PFS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 11.0-NE), with 1-year PFS and OS rates of 73% and 87%. Safety profile was manageable, with only 13% G3/G4 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Metronomic capecitabine, bevacizumab, and MMC are an active regimen in advanced and progressive PMP and favorably compares with historical series.

Outcomes and a prognostic classifier in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic gastric cancer receiving PD-1 blockade.

BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses of randomized trials suggest the superiority of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy over chemotherapy in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, these subgroups are small and studies examining prognostic features within dMMR/MSI-high patients are lacking. METHODS: We conducted an international cohort study at tertiary cancer centers and collected baseline clinicopathologic features of patients with dMMR/MSI-high metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer treated with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-based therapies. The adjusted HRs of variables significantly associated with overall survival (OS) were used to develop a prognostic score. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients were included. At a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30.3 months (95% CI: 20.4 to NA) and 2-year PFS rate was 56% (95% CI: 48% to 66%). Median OS was of 62.5 months (95% CI: 28.4 to NA) and 2-year OS rate was 63% (95% CI: 55% to 73%). Among the 103 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-evaluable patients, objective response rate was 66% and disease control rate 87% across lines of therapy. In the multivariable models, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or 2, non-resected primary tumor, presence of bone metastases and malignant ascites were independently associated with poorer PFS and OS. These four clinical variables were used to build a three-category (ie, good, intermediate, and poor risk) prognostic score. Compared with patients with good risk, patients with intermediate risk score had numerically inferior PFS and OS (2-year PFS rate: 54.3% versus 74.5%, HR 1.90, 95% CI: 0.99 to 3.66; 2-year OS rate: 66.8% versus 81.2%, HR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.87 to 3.98), whereas patients with poor risk score had significantly inferior PFS and OS (2-year PFS rate: 10.6%, HR 9.65, 95% CI: 4.67 to 19.92; 2-year OS rate: 13.3%, HR 11.93, 95% CI: 5.42 to 26.23). CONCLUSIONS: Overall outcomes with anti-PD-1-based therapies are favorable in MSI-high gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. However, within this overall favorable subgroup a more accurate prognostication using baseline clinical characteristics might identify patients at higher risk of rapid disease progression who may deserve intensified immunotherapy combination strategies.

Tumour mutational burden as a biomarker in patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard treatment in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is a promising biomarker for the prediction of treatment outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We screened 203 patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with an anti-PD-(L)1 (anti-Programmed-Death-(Ligand)1) plus or minus an anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) agent at three Italian Academic Centers. TMB was tested by Foundation One Next Generation Sequencing assay and correlated with clinical outcomes, in the overall population and according to ICI regimen. RESULTS: We included 110 patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC. Eighty patients received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy and 30 received anti-CTLA-4 combinations. Median TMB was 49 mut/Mb (range: 8-251 mut/Mb). The optimal prognostic cut-off for progression-free survival (PFS) stratification was 23 mut/Mb. Patients with TMB ≤23 mut/Mb had significantly worse PFS (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] = 4.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.85-9.82, p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (aHR = 5.14, 95% CI: 1.76-14.98, p = 0.003). Using a cut-off optimised for predicting treatment outcome, anti-CTLA-4 combination was associated with a significant PFS/OS benefit versus anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in patients with TMB>40 mut/Mb (2-year PFS: 100.0% versus 70.7%, p = 0.002; 2-year OS: 100.0% versus 76.0%, p = 0.025), but not in those with TMB ≤40 mut/Mb (2-year PFS: 59.7% versus 68.6%, p = 0.888; 2-year OS: 80.0% versus 81.0%, p = 0.949). CONCLUSION: Patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC and relatively lower TMB value displayed early disease progression when receiving ICIs, whereas patients with the highest TMB values may obtain the maximal benefit from intensified anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 combination.

Optimal treatment strategy after first-line induction therapy in advanced HER2-positive oeso-gastric adenocarcinoma-a retrospective, international, multicentric AGEO study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy after first-line induction therapy in advanced HER2-positive oeso-gastric adenocarcinoma (OGA) remains challenging. METHODS: Patients treated with trastuzumab (T) plus platinum salts and fluoropyrimidine (F) as first-line chemotherapy between 2010 and 2020 for HER2-positive advanced OGA at 17 academic care centers in France, Italy, and Austria were included. The primary objective was the comparison of F + T vs T alone as maintenance regimen in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after a platinum-based chemotherapy induction + T. As secondary objective, PFS and OS between patients treated with reintroduction of initial chemotherapy or standard second-line chemotherapy at progression were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 157 patients included, 86 (55%) received F + T and 71 (45%) T alone as a maintenance regimen after a median of 4 months of induction chemotherapy. Median PFS from start of maintenance therapy was 5.1 months in both groups (95% CI 4.2-7.7 for F + T and 95% CI 3.7-7.5 for T alone; p = 0.60) and median OS was 15.2 (95% CI 10.9-19.1) and 17.0 months (95% CI 15.5-21.6) for F + T and T alone, respectively (p = 0.40). Of 112/157 patients (71%) receiving systemic therapy after progression under maintenance, 26/112 (23%) were treated with a reintroduction of initial chemotherapy + T and 86/112 (77%) with a standard second-line regimen. Here, median OS was significantly longer with the reintroduction (13.8 (95% CI 12.1-19.9) vs 9.0 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9); p = 0.007) as confirmed by multivariate analysis (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.85; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: No additional benefit of adding F to T monotherapy as a maintenance treatment could be observed. Reintroduction of initial therapy at first progression may be a feasible approach to preserve later treatment lines.